- From: simon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 06:18:28 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
> The "collection" is never "in or not in effect", ... 👍 > ... but the Assets or Parties that satisfy the constraint are in/not in effect ... 👎 > ... (ie they will be the effective targets/assignee/r's for the rule) 👍 --> as I said earlier, constraints attached to p/a collections don't regulate whether their collections are in effect or not **(+ or whether members of those collections are generally in effect or not)**, but define subsets of those collections **(+ consisting of members that satisfy the constraints)** to which respective rules apply. ------- how would any **individual** asset be able to satisfy the asset constraint in [Example 21](https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#constraint-asset): > The target also has a constraint that specifies further context on the characteristics of the AssetCollection items. In this case, the target Assets will be no more than 50 resources from the media catalogue, and each of those may be printed. isn't that a constraint on the asset collection itself (i.e. have at most 50 members)? -- GitHub Notification of comment by simonstey Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/203#issuecomment-313008608 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2017 06:18:33 UTC