public-poe-archives@w3.org from July 2017 by date

Monday, 31 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies aisaac via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Renato Iannella via GitHub

Sunday, 30 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Michael Steidl via GitHub

Tuesday, 25 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 24 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Michael Steidl via GitHub

Friday, 21 July 2017

• Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] IM wording for classes and their relationships Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] revising vocabulary definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Checking the dynamic use of partOf Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Can policy metadata be serialized in the XML encoding Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Can policy metadata be serialized in the XML encoding marked as XML Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Does the JSON-LD serialization distinguish human-readable and machine-readable strings for DC terms? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Does the JSON-LD serialization distinguish human-readable and machine-readable strings for DC terms? marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] I18N Review: does Policy Metadata need Unicode normalization Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: I18N Review: does Policy Metadata need Unicode normalization marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 19 July 2017

• [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: XML Schema design marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 17 July 2017

• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub

Friday, 14 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] assigneeTo and assignerTo inverse properties? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] not all contraint operators are logical operators Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] ODRL Ontology: formal definition and design issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Requirements of Agreement Policies Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema design Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology? marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 13 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 11 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 10 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub

Saturday, 8 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub

Friday, 7 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary marked as Vocab Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Synchronize (addition to vocab) Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Evaluation of Constraints of a Rule inconsistent marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Checking the dynamic use of partOf marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: revising vocabulary definitions marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Single vs. Collection of Asset and Party unclear marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: IM wording for classes and their relationships marked as To Be Closed Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 6 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Range of RightOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 5 July 2017

• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Range of RightOperand simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Range of RightOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Range of RightOperand simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Range of RightOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Constraint Narrative Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Model clarifications Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Duty->Consequence Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Duty->Consequence marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Range of RightOperand marked as Model Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] Range of RightOperand Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 3 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation fornaran via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction benedictws via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] ODRL Processor & Test Suite Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Saturday, 1 July 2017

• Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses Michael Steidl via GitHub

Last message date: Monday, 31 July 2017 12:57:06 UTC