W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [poe] Constraint specs currently do not cover logic operation on constraints

From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:45:30 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-275576788-1485485129-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
1 - I have applied all these change...

2 - I did not include "it SHOULD include the entity it constrains and 
how its value for a comparison has to be retrieved/generated." as we 
have no way of actually supporting that now. We once discussed 
"subjectOf" but the consensus seemed to be to have better constraint 

3 - Updated vocab with "This operator MUST only be used for Constraint

4 - I can't see us defining which constraints are valid for Constraint
 Relations. I think that is a business decision for communities. (or I
 missed your point ;-)

5 -  In XML, you will see a "#" id and, or course, the operator will 
tell you too.

6 - Yes, status can change anytime. It is useful if you transfer a 
license between systems and need to indicate past history. (eg you 
have used 50 of your 100 counts)

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/94#issuecomment-275576788 using your
 GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 02:45:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:46:59 UTC