W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [poe] Use of the label Left Operand in the ontology/vocabulary

From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:25:03 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-272906118-1484583901-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@vroddon at the call on 9 January - 
https://www.w3.org/2017/01/09-poe-minutes - something similar was 
discussed: constraint vs Constraint.
Following what @riannella said then: should we label the leftOperand 
as Has LeftOperand (http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-constraint) 
and keep the LeftOperand as it is?

Regarding naming conventions: there are also some recommending to 
prefix a class with "has" or "is" for the corresponding property - see
 
http://wiki.opensemanticframework.org/index.php/Ontology_Best_Practices#Naming_and_Vocabulary_Best_Practices

This convention would result in the class LeftOperand and the property
 hasLeftOperand even for he identifiers. 


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/87#issuecomment-272906118 using your
 GitHub account
Received on Monday, 16 January 2017 16:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:46:59 UTC