W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [poe] Use of the label Left Operand in the ontology/vocabulary

From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:25:03 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-272906118-1484583901-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@vroddon at the call on 9 January - 
https://www.w3.org/2017/01/09-poe-minutes - something similar was 
discussed: constraint vs Constraint.
Following what @riannella said then: should we label the leftOperand 
as Has LeftOperand (http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-constraint) 
and keep the LeftOperand as it is?

Regarding naming conventions: there are also some recommending to 
prefix a class with "has" or "is" for the corresponding property - see

This convention would result in the class LeftOperand and the property
 hasLeftOperand even for he identifiers. 

GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/87#issuecomment-272906118 using your
 GitHub account
Received on Monday, 16 January 2017 16:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:46:59 UTC