- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:25:03 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@vroddon at the call on 9 January - https://www.w3.org/2017/01/09-poe-minutes - something similar was discussed: constraint vs Constraint. Following what @riannella said then: should we label the leftOperand as Has LeftOperand (http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-constraint) and keep the LeftOperand as it is? Regarding naming conventions: there are also some recommending to prefix a class with "has" or "is" for the corresponding property - see http://wiki.opensemanticframework.org/index.php/Ontology_Best_Practices#Naming_and_Vocabulary_Best_Practices This convention would result in the class LeftOperand and the property hasLeftOperand even for he identifiers. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/87#issuecomment-272906118 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 16 January 2017 16:25:09 UTC