- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:32:39 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
riannella has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe: == Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? == ISSUE-11: Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? parties of perm/proh Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? State: RAISED Product: POE - Information Model Raised by: Simon Steyskal Opened on: 2016-11-08 Description: The current spec states (comments inline; similar for prohibition): > 3.4 Permission > > The Permission entity indicates the Actions that the assignee is permitted to perform on the associated Asset. It is not required for perm/proh to have any party assigned. > In other words, what the assigner (supplier) has granted to the assignee (consumer). I would argue that not every assigner/assignee has the role of a supplier/consumer. > [...] > Party: the Permission MUST refer to one or more Party entities linked via the Role entity (see Section 2.3.1) (OPTIONAL) Is it possible to combine MUST and OPTIONAL? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/113 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2017 00:32:45 UTC