- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:05:15 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
As I recall the Action vocabulary discussion for ODRL 2.1 the intention of Present was to define at a generic level: this action is targeting an audience beyond the assignees = the assignee is the party presenting the asset to a wider/public/b2c audience. All the other sub-terms of "use" are actions in the context of the assignee only. And the "real" actions of presenting the asset are the sub-terms of Present. Therefore it is no surprise that taking away the "to a (public) audience" leaves a term with small semantics. The suggested suffix above is unclear and limiting: is playing a MP3 file covered by "visual or static form", and what exactly is rending an asset in static form? And this raises a basic issue (again): the current ODRL specs do not explicitly define that an Asset MUST be digital. (... can ODRL be used to grant the display of an artwork from a museum?) Note on the use of the Recipient constraint. The current language may surprise a reader: a _constraint_ should be used to _widen_ the group of people using the asset - that's a contradiction at first sight and hard to understand. The most bullet proof variant is to claim for Present and all its sub-terms that the Recipient (the Assignee or more people) must be defined by a constraint. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/101#issuecomment-281037034 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 20 February 2017 10:05:22 UTC