- From: stuartmyles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:16:58 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Good catch! I think the problem here is that we didn't cover the pattern properties in the ODRL Context. Here it is in the JSON Schema: "patternProperties": { "^[a-z]+party": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }, "^[a-z]+_scope": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" } } What this is saying is that other parties and scopes are possible, beyond assigner and assignee. Let me see if we can find a JSON-LD equivalent. Regards, Stuart On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Renato Iannella <notifications@github.com> wrote: > There are some technical issues with the new context - namely "scope" is a > property of a Party (or Asset) and we have an explicit "assignee_scope" - > meaning every role would need to define that? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-279602329>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADwBf3iignoKhLGTx1MxUc1qbvUqu4lEks5rcSfhgaJpZM4KZWR0> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by stuartmyles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-280377599 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 16:17:09 UTC