- From: stuartmyles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:16:58 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Good catch! I think the problem here is that we didn't cover the
pattern
properties in the ODRL Context.
Here it is in the JSON Schema:
"patternProperties": {
"^[a-z]+party": {
"type": "string",
"format": "uri"
},
"^[a-z]+_scope": {
"type": "string",
"format": "uri" }
}
What this is saying is that other parties and scopes are possible,
beyond
assigner and assignee. Let me see if we can find a JSON-LD equivalent.
Regards,
Stuart
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Renato Iannella
<notifications@github.com>
wrote:
> There are some technical issues with the new context - namely
"scope" is a
> property of a Party (or Asset) and we have an explicit
"assignee_scope" -
> meaning every role would need to define that?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-279602329>, or
mute
> the thread
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADwBf3iignoKhLGTx1MxUc1qbvUqu4lEks5rcSfhgaJpZM4KZWR0>
> .
>
--
GitHub Notification of comment by stuartmyles
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-280377599 using your
GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 16:17:09 UTC