[poe] Issue: Making ODRL2.2 to be OWL DL marked as Ontology

vroddon has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as 
"Ontology":

== Making ODRL2.2 to be OWL DL ==
# **PROBLEM**
If you check the current complexity of the ontology, you will see it 
is not OWL DL.
You might want to test at the most famous OWL validator: 
[Manchester](http://mowl-power.cs.man.ac.uk:8080/validator/validate)
Because it is sometimes down, I created my own wrapper around OWL-API.
[My OWL profiler](http://owlprofiler.appspot.com)
We may want to claim that the ODRL Ontology is OWL DL. We are near but
 a few technicalities prevent us from being compliant.

# **POSSIBLE SOLUTION**
The possible solution consists of:
**1. Declaring annotation properties as such. Adding the type of class
 to a few URIs.**
```
skos:broader rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:member rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:note rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:scopeNote rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:prefLabel rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:definition rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:broaderTransitive rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
skos:hasTopConcept rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:contributor rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:license rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:issued rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:subject rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:creator rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:description rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:isVersionOf rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dct:format rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
dcmit:Text a owl:Class .        
skos:Collection a owl:Class .   
skos:Concept a owl:Class .      
skos:ConceptScheme a owl:Class .        
voaf:Vocabulary a owl:Class .   
```
**2. Removing rdfs:Resource as range of properties**
See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/108
Act similarly with xsd:any.

I have tested myself introducing these changes, and the ontology 
validates then happily as OWL DL in the Manchester validator. Indeed, 
this is an important change and I think approval is needed before 
applying this.


See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/107

Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 13:50:19 UTC