- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:31:10 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@vroddon: the issue is not really technical but, instead, procedural and social. We do have a term (`dct:license`) that is defined and maintained by a reputable organization (DCMI). Changing/modifying the semantics of a term defined by DMCI should not be done without a synchronization with those who are responsible for it. We _could_ get into contact with the DCMI to decide with them whether it is o.k. for each and every `dct:license` relationship to imply an `odrl:hasPolicy`. If they agree, then we would be fine doing this. But just as we would not be happy if a third party decided to change/extend the semantics of an ODRL term without our approval, due diligence would require for us to contact DCMI. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/286#issuecomment-353051189 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 12:31:12 UTC