- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:28:00 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Comments on: 1) There was previous concern that Asset was the parent of Policy, so I suggest we remove that relationship. 2) This means that Policy does not have a "scope" which is better. 3) Do you think we need to add more details to the Note in Section 3.1 (remember that in XML, we actually have attributes called uid and type) 4) hopefully the new figure will work 5) Should we add uid and type to the ontology and say to use rdf:about in the RDF section (for example)? 6) hopefully clearer now in the proposed disagram RE: linking between the IM and the Vocab - do you propose that for every term in the IM (that has a definition in the Vocab) that we href that text string? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/128#issuecomment-296003491 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 21 April 2017 01:28:07 UTC