- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:07:54 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
I copy and paste from my proposed refined left operand definitions, any subject beyond the Action is in **bold**: - absoluteTemporalPositionAsset: The absolute temporal positions in a media stream the **Asset** has to fit in after the Action. - fileFormatBefore: The file format of the **Asset** before the Action is exercised. - version: The range of versions of the **Asset** which can or cannot be used for exercising the Action. In fact in these examples only the Asset is the alternative subject - and included into the free-text definition of the constraint. Regarding a party as subject: I recall discussions where it was said that assignees could be constrained by a definition of this party, e.g. we have in a RightsML example "all customers of the assigner-company XYZ". A special facet of that are recipients: They are neither Assigner nor Assignee. But for that we have already a constraint: "The party receiving the result of an exercised Action." If one wants to constrain these people to students then the right operand value has to define a corresponding entity. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/60#issuecomment-262737985 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:08:00 UTC