Re: [poe] Add Constraint to Party and Asset

The first example shows a URI for the assignee.
The second example does the same, but then goes further and says, 
"that assignee is further scoped by this URI".
You can imagine in another Permission, there is the same employee URI 
but with a "over18" scope.

This is my interpretation of the original requirement.
I would support the removal of scopes.

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at using your
 GitHub account

Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 05:42:35 UTC