- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 07:43:58 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
I am not sure. That is a very strong statement, that means that anybody using dct:Policy would be automatically having an odrl:Policy, too. If we do that, then we should get an agreement from DCMI and it actually raises the question of why we are having an odrl policy in the first place. Another (and not problematic) statement is to use rdfs:subClassOf instead. Ivan > On 9 Dec 2016, at 08:25, Renato Iannella <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > Add owl:sameAs axion to the ODRL Ontology (to enable greater semantic interoperability) > > eg; odrl:Policy owl:sameAs dct:Policy > > Make more suggestions here... > -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/83#issuecomment-265953223 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 07:44:10 UTC