- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:48:06 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
>From @victor: I fully support this. This creates, again, alternative manners to express the same thing. But again, I believe that if necessary, a simple script can transform these expressions into a "canonical form". I guess that we can define a "canonical" representation of one policy. And then, different syntaxes that can be algorithmically mapped to the canonical representation. By having a canonical representation we can grant that (to some extent) policies with the same meaning can be compared and matched. This would be work, though, for the formalization task force, I guess. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/82#issuecomment-265926687 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 03:48:13 UTC