- From: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:48:58 -0400
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group" <public-png@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAG3W2Kd8-=PCR3fYSheNPKm6BvDTX-+BZe8yegvgNRoV+-_Bog@mail.gmail.com>
I would love your input, Leonard. The issue/concern was raised in this GitHub comment <https://github.com/w3c/png/pull/544#issuecomment-3417689319>. I am trying to catch up on several things and haven't yet gotten around to this. That is why I was vague and unsure when listing the discussion topic. My hope is that it is a misunderstanding of what C2PA can & can't do. On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 11:31 AM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote: > @Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com> - happy to chat about > C2PA (and PNG) at the meeting on Monday, but curious who is raising the > issues and what the overall concern is - either in general, or for PNG or > both. > > Leonard > > *From: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com> > *Date: *Friday, October 24, 2025 at 4:30 PM > *To: *Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group <public-png@w3.org> > *Subject: *[PNG] Meeting topics - Oct 27th, 2025 > > *EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.* > > > Hello everyone, > > This coming Monday is a PNG WG meeting. I think we should discuss: > > - C2PA apparently has some problems. The chunk can be removed, sure. > And a new chunk could be created to claim ownership. This much is expected. > You would need to look at the dates on the claims, right? But maybe there > are problems beyond that? > - TPAC 2025 is coming up shortly. We have a time slot to meet and also > give other groups more vision into our work. I expect we'll give a summary > of our work so far and field questions. Let's discuss what we should have > prepared for TPAC. > > See you Monday! >
Received on Sunday, 26 October 2025 17:49:15 UTC