- From: Leo Barnes <barnes.leo@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:48:41 +0200
- To: "Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal)" <Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com>
- Cc: "Chris Blume (ProgramMax)" <programmax@gmail.com>, "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group" <public-png@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAeLMUhO4B1m5TeywTsvc3vt6DCniPA+v4p2CspCdsAB9jru5A@mail.gmail.com>
Dimitri pointed out that PNG does not seem to have support for T.35 metadata. It might be a good idea to add that as well. Cheers, //Leo On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 16:32, Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) < Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> wrote: > Also, a bunch of us would like to suggest adding “Gain Curves” with “Gain > Maps”. > > > > -Chris > > > > > > *From: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 9:25 AM > *To: *Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) <Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> > *Cc: *Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group <public-png@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] [PNG] Upcoming meeting topics (Fourth Edition) > > Works for me :) > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:51 AM Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) < > Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris B., > > > > I’d like to suggest changing dWLm to rWtm (Reference White Metadata). > This follows discussions in other standards groups. HDR Reference White > Metadata would describe diffuse white values other than “Nominal HDR > Reference White” which equals 203nits. > > > > Best, > > Chris Seeger > > > > *From: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 7:52 AM > *To: *Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group <public-png@w3.org> > *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [PNG] Upcoming meeting topics (Fourth Edition) > > Hello everyone, > > We are cutting a feature branch for Third Edition and continuing work onto > Fourth Edition. > So our topics for discussion are Fourth Edition items: > > - negative cHRM values > - Inserting deflate restart markers into a stream where a new scanline > with compatible filter allows -- add new chunk to indicate the location of > those restart markers > > > - possibly also not at scanline w/ compatible filter locations -- > we'll want to gather information on deflate decode time vs. other png work > time to see if parallelizing just that portion is worth it > > > - Compression methods other than deflate > - Gain maps > - Generic image data > - dWLm > > Possible other topics which have been mentioned but aren't in a Github > issue: > > - Boundaries other than scanlines. For example, blocks. > > > > There are probably more topics I'm forgetting right now. Feel free to > reply with them so they get included. But this will be more than enough for > one meeting. :) > > See you Monday! > >
Received on Monday, 31 March 2025 09:50:11 UTC