Re: [PNG] Meeting topics? Cancel?

I'm going to go ahead and cancel the meeting.

Although there are topics we could discuss,
1.) My late email didn't offer much time for attendees to think about the
topics, and
2.) They seem small enough that it would be an awkwardly short meeting
anyway.

When we have more to discuss, I'll probably append those topics onto the
agenda. In the meantime, we can discuss them via GitHub issues & email.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 12:01 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <
programmax@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Sorry for the late email. I lost track of the days. Normally, I want to
> sort out topics for discussion early so people have time to think about it.
>
> I'm looking at emails now and maybe we don't have much to discuss, anyway.
> There are still some topics, but they might be short & sweet--good fit for
> email or GitHub issues, perhaps:
>
>    - Cosmin wanted to discuss non-normative recommendations for decoders
>    that encounter broken PNG files. We already cleaned this up a bit in Third
>    Edition. Maybe that cleanup was sufficient?
>    - John Bowler mentioned a recursive PNG parsing with iHDR, iDAT, and
>    lABL chunks, allowing a keyword registry to allow generic data. This should
>    probably go into a GitHub issue.
>    - Gain maps were published, but non-free. So we're still waiting on
>    that. Gain curves are not yet published, I believe?
>
> Does anyone else have topics to discuss?
> Should these topics be in a meeting or should we cancel?
>
> Thanks!
>