Re: [PNG] Chromium nightly build now supports eXIf, WPT passing

On 2024-02-06 12:31, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
> Right. I only added support for the eXIf chunk when it arrives before 
> IDAT.
> That test uses the eXIf chunk arriving after IDAT (invalid, should be 
> ignored). Then it uses zTXt to package EXIF data early.
Right. I should add one that uses eXIf early as well to be sure that one 
works.
>
> Support for EXIF in zTXt should be added. But I wanted to focus on 
> just the eXIf chunk to resolve the 'at risk' concern.
Of course!
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:29 AM Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>     On 2024-02-06 07:41, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
>>     Hello everyone,
>>
>>     Yesterday, my eXIf patch for Chromium landed
>>     <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5249880>.
>>     It takes a while for WPT bots to pick up the latest build. But
>>     the WPT eXIf test now shows Chromium passing
>>     <https://wpt.fyi/results/png/exif-chunk.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned>.
>
>     Excellent.
>
>     Although oddly, this one still fails. Should dig into it more
>     https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images/image-orientation/image-orientation-exif-png.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
>     <https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images/image-orientation/image-orientation-exif-png.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned>
>
>>
>>     That makes two browsers. I believe we can remove the 'at risk'
>>     mark for eXIf.
>     Yes. PR incoming.
>
>     -- 
>     Chris Lilley
>     @svgeesus
>     Technical Director @ W3C
>     W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
>     W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>
-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media