- From: Leo Barnes <lbarnes@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:15:53 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group" <public-png@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2023 19:16:43 UTC
> On Nov 15, 2023, at 20:12, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > > Thanks for that data, although it mainly covers JPEG-compressed images. > > I would be interested to see a comparison between, for example: > > 8 bit PNG compressed SDR image plus 10 bit PNG compressed HDR image > 8 bit PNG compressed baseline SDR image containing un-resampled 16-bit gain map > both in terms of file sizes and also in terms of per-pixel error visualization in the reconstructed alternate image. > Right. I have no idea how this behaves for PNG. The work has mainly been intended for photographic content. It's very hard to predict how it will behave for a deflate-based compression scheme. Cheers, //Leo > On 2023-11-15 14:03, Leo Barnes wrote: >>> The claim of storage efficiency has not been backed up by any measurements that I have seen. >> >> It's in the white-paper <https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/using/gain-map.html> published by Adobe: > -- > Chris Lilley > @svgeesus > Technical Director @ W3C > W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design > W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2023 19:16:43 UTC