- From: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 18:36:20 -0400
- To: public-png@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG3W2Kedc+HOuXP35KH=sXjZx0t2We89JjV4CADv9ojmA_ZeYw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello everyone, My internet suddenly dropped out yesterday and has been pretty unstable ever since. I'm not confident that I'll be able to host Monday's meeting. I'm happy for someone else to host if they want. But we also might not have much to talk about which couldn't be an email. - Do we know of any standard which carries average luminance information? (This is different from MaxFALL.) This is needed for SMPTE ST 2094-10. We could perhaps add it to the cLLi chunk. But then that chunk no longer resembles the standard it was based on. Plus, the content authoring app could know that the content isn't in a color space where average luminance is a normal tool for tone mapping (and thus SMPTE ST 2094-10 doesn't apply). - Anne suggested we use official wording for implementation defined <https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#implementation-defined> when it comes to either historic implementation divergence which we now corrected onto one path, or things we do not want to define. I think this is a good idea. Thoughts? - No one has mentioned yet if they feel the PNG WG should make an official presence at TPAC 2023. (We can still go if we want.) Unless there is a push for it, I'll respond to W3C soon letting them know we do not intend to go as a group. Let me know your thoughts on these topics and if you want to keep Monday's meeting. Thanks! - Chris
Received on Friday, 12 May 2023 22:36:37 UTC