Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: clli change from mLUm

Everything is the same except the name.

It’s a change from mLUm to cLLi everywhere in the doc.

Data and syntax are unchanged.

cLLi will match the full descriptive name “Content Light Level Information” which is used everywhere else.  It was a miss on my part, but I think will avoid confusion for those who are familiar with pre-existing terminology: cLLi.

-Chris


From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 5:56 PM
To: Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) <Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com>
Cc: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>, public-png@w3.org <public-png@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: clli change from mLUm
(a) Is this absolutely necessary and (b) are the semantics and
encoding of the ISO structure identical to the current mLUm?

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 2:53 PM Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal)
<Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> Should I proceed with the cLLi change from mLUm?
>
>
> Best,
> Chris