Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PNG] Cancel May 16th, 2022 meeting?

I was able to squash your commits. But I was unable to push my changes onto
your repo. Unfortunately, that is where the code review comments are.

I was able to preserve your commit authorship and push it to my repo here:
https://github.com/ProgramMax/PNG-spec/commits/add-iccn-chunk2

For the purpose of moving forward, I'll go ahead and address code review
comments on this change and submit a replacement pull request.

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:42 PM Seeger, Chris (NBCUniversal) <
Chris.Seeger@nbcuni.com> wrote:

> Hi Chris, Pierre-Anthony,
>
>
>
> Is there anything you need from me at this point after the “squash”.
>
>
>
> Do I need to add/change a chunk as per the ongoing discussion?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Chris Seeger
>
>
>
> *From: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, May 16, 2022 at 8:15 AM
> *To: *Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
> *Cc: *public-png@w3.org <public-png@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [PNG] Cancel May 16th, 2022 meeting?
>
> Hello Pierre-Anthony,
>
> For iCCN, Chris Seeger has a patch out:
> https://github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/pull/117
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/pull/117__;!!PIZeeW5wscynRQ!tY7YDmN5QvCT2EljSFRv47bGC4gpJe1PrzUtUXJEw44emqBh8-PBXGL3WCEo2oOU4gWRBtVa0fgdSTJ9Zlf5$>
> I'm helping him squash it, as per a review comment. (We ran into a problem
> where Git really does not want to squash commits.)
> Additionally, I need to go back through Color on the Web Community Group
> history and convince myself that iCCM (iccMAX) is indeed an option for us.
> That will end up changing the iCCN patch.
>
> So right now, I think I am the holdup. I'll try to unblock.
>
>
> I do not think all "3rd edition" or even "2nd edition errata" issues are
> blocking. For example, under "3rd edition" is an issue "Update figures".
> That issue wants to both modernize some dated figure designs and fix text
> clipping. (I looked into it and do not see a way in SVG to prevent that
> text clipping.) The figures are usable as-is so this isn't a blocking
> issue. This issue is more of a "nice to have".
>
> I think the only work left blocking the 3rd edition draft is the iCCN/iCCM
> and ReSpec error cleanup.
>
>
> Once I unblock the iCCN/iCCM patch, I'll update the issues with a more
> clear blocking/nice-to-have indicator.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:35 AM Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Nothing urgent from me.
>
> What is blocking https://github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/issues/95
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/issues/95__;!!PIZeeW5wscynRQ!tY7YDmN5QvCT2EljSFRv47bGC4gpJe1PrzUtUXJEw44emqBh8-PBXGL3WCEo2oOU4gWRBtVa0fgdSTVVWD33$>
> ?
>
> Are all issues scheduled against "3rd edition" milestone [1] blocking?
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/milestone/2
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/milestone/2__;!!PIZeeW5wscynRQ!tY7YDmN5QvCT2EljSFRv47bGC4gpJe1PrzUtUXJEw44emqBh8-PBXGL3WCEo2oOU4gWRBtVa0fgdSVz0C7ST$>
>
> Best,
>
> -- Pierre
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 8:45 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax)
> <programmax@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > It seems there are no new issues that need group discussion and thought.
> > Unless someone has an idea for discussion, let's cancel the May 16th,
> 2022 meeting.
>
>