- From: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:40:37 -0500
- To: public-png@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG3W2KcZt1-fkkfj1Ug=NeUCPGfqz0GXGg1pDC_c4qDcKTWZeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Attached is a PDF of the meeting minutes from Feb 21st, 2022.
Attendance was low. This could be because 1.) It is a holiday in the US,
and 2.) I sent the discussion topics late. I'm not worried about #1 but for
#2, I'll try to send topics earlier.
Executive summary:
- Our group prefers not to meet in person right now for TPAC 2022
- A hybrid approach might be difficult. It wouldn't be surprising if
a discussion is happening in-person without careful regard to
mic / camera
placement. This would then leave remote participants at a disadvantage.
- The tRNS chunk ambiguity might not require action. In both the
unused-bits case and the out-of-bounds palette index case, we don't know of
any real world images that people have run into. Rather, they seem to be
crafted images to demonstrate the ambiguity.
- While it might be nice for a spec to minimize ambiguity, there is a
cost to forcing implementations to change. And since we don't foresee a
benefit, the best action is to perhaps add a note that the
ambiguity exists
and there are conflicting implementations. But a valid image will not hit
the ambiguity.
The next meeting will be Mar 7th, 2022 from 11am-noon Eastern US time.
A future email will list topics for that meeting.
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: PNG_WG_Meeting_Minutes_-_Feb_21st__2022.pdf
Received on Monday, 21 February 2022 16:40:59 UTC