- From: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:40:37 -0500
- To: public-png@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG3W2KcZt1-fkkfj1Ug=NeUCPGfqz0GXGg1pDC_c4qDcKTWZeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Attached is a PDF of the meeting minutes from Feb 21st, 2022. Attendance was low. This could be because 1.) It is a holiday in the US, and 2.) I sent the discussion topics late. I'm not worried about #1 but for #2, I'll try to send topics earlier. Executive summary: - Our group prefers not to meet in person right now for TPAC 2022 - A hybrid approach might be difficult. It wouldn't be surprising if a discussion is happening in-person without careful regard to mic / camera placement. This would then leave remote participants at a disadvantage. - The tRNS chunk ambiguity might not require action. In both the unused-bits case and the out-of-bounds palette index case, we don't know of any real world images that people have run into. Rather, they seem to be crafted images to demonstrate the ambiguity. - While it might be nice for a spec to minimize ambiguity, there is a cost to forcing implementations to change. And since we don't foresee a benefit, the best action is to perhaps add a note that the ambiguity exists and there are conflicting implementations. But a valid image will not hit the ambiguity. The next meeting will be Mar 7th, 2022 from 11am-noon Eastern US time. A future email will list topics for that meeting.
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: PNG_WG_Meeting_Minutes_-_Feb_21st__2022.pdf
Received on Monday, 21 February 2022 16:40:59 UTC