- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:11:08 +1000
- To: pling <public-pling@w3.org>
On 29 Apr 2010, at 01:34, Rigo Wenning wrote: > What is the opinion of > PLING? Should we accept there suggestion? If No, what should we suggest > instead? Rigo, I would recommend that they merge ma:copyright and ma:policy (as they overlap semantically) into ma:policy, with these attributes: ma:policy.statement ma:policy.identifier ma:policy.issuer ma:policy.type statement - a human-readable (text) description of the policy identifier - a URI linking to a machine-readable description of the policy issuer - an identifier of the issuer of the policy type - the category of the policy (possible values: license, access, privacy) *Any other types we should recommend? Examples: ma:policy[0].statement = "Copyright W3C 2010" ma:policy[1].identifier = "http://p3pbook.com/examples/10-4.xml" ma:policy[1].issuer = "P3P Book Inc" ma:policy[1].type = "privacy" ma:policy[2].identifier = "http://odrl.net/license/license.xml" ma:policy[2].issuer = "http://odrl.net/" ma:policy[2].type = "license" Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 01:14:20 UTC