- From: Daniel Olmedilla <olmedilla@l3s.de>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 02:26:58 +0100
- To: "Somaya Aboulwafa" <somaya.ahmad@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-pling@w3.org
Hi Somaya, could you elaborate a bit more on your goals? Do you want to investigate interactions between different frameworks (using the same policy language and characteristics) or mapping between different policy languages? If you refer to the latter, there was a short paper in POLICY 2007 ("Web Rule Languages to Carry Policies") on that direction. However, my main concern is about the scenario in which such approach is useful. If you try to map two different policy languages, there are two possibilities: - Both languages have same expressiveness. Otherwise, part of the meaning of the policy is lost. I don't know of scenarios in which that would be acceptable, but if you have I would be very interested. - Identify the common subset of the two languages and restrict the policies to that subset in order to allow for 100% mappings. Cheers, D. On Sunday 11 November 2007, Somaya Aboulwafa wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to investigate the value and the applicability of mapping > the query/response of different policy frameworks, so that parties > (could be agents, web services, etc.) from different policy domains > can communicate directly in transparent manner. > Practically speaking, I need to know what are the most needed > transformations in the context? from which language to which? > Does anyone working in a policy management frameworks have > recommendations in this track? > > Regards, > Somaya -- Dr. Daniel Olmedilla L3S Research Center and Hannover University Appelstr. 9a D - 30167 Hannover Phone: +49 (0)511-762.17741 Fax: +49 (0)511-762.17779 http://www.L3S.de/~olmedilla/ E-Mail: olmedilla@L3S.de
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 01:27:14 UTC