Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts

Correction...

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:
>> other choices:
>>
>> *    use thismessage:  from MHTML
>> *    fix   file:
>>      (packages only work for http: and local
>>      file system, not ftp:, but not a big
>>       restriction in practice).
>
>
> packages and configuration documents should be kept URI neutral (so
> one can use them over HTTP as various projects are already doing).
> However, we still want to specify a URI scheme for widget that run
> locally so engines to fall back to file://

Sorry, I meant so engines _DON'T_ fall back to file://

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 14:46:20 UTC