Fwd: Thoughts/comments on "Philosophical Engineering: Toward a Philosophy of the Web"

Hi again Michael,

Le Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:02:10 +0100, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
a écrit:

> Hello Alexandre,

>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:46:23PM +0100, Alexandre Monnin wrote:
>> True, just like more or less than 25% of Wikipedia edits are generated
>> by
>> bots. I've co-written a piece myself about the evolution of the Web that
>> might be somehow relevant for this discussion:
>> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-859/
>
> Thanks. I will read that.

>
>> > It is difficult for me to see a *qualitative* difference between the
>> pre
>> > Web
>> > state and now. What is so special about the Web ?
>>
>> See above.
>>
>> Also, I think the more philosophical papers tried to address this issue
>> ;)
>> My answer had to do with the very notion of "resources" and the details
>> behind the making of the Web, drawing from Brian Cantwell Smith to state
>> that to account for the Web, on needs to reopen questions pertaining to
>> ontology, intentionality, etc.
>
> The following question came to my mind when reading your essay: What is
> the fundamental difference between "The New York Times" and
> http://times.com/ ?
> I can walk to a kiosk at any time and say "Give me the New York Times".

Interesting, you're not the first person to raise this question.

I think the comparison is often drawn with regards to the idea of the
physical realization of information objects (whatever that means!). In that
case, you can say that an information object is realized just as the URI
identifying a resource is dereferenced to an Http representation.

But the comparison fails to grasp important aspects of objects in general -
not just information objects.

http://times.com/ might refer to the institution that is the Times, or the
newspaper, or its online version, or just the website (but then again, what
exactly is a website now? Certainly not something that can ever be realized
with paper...), etc. All of which might have different identity conditions.
That why the question of individuation, for me, is at the heart of the Web.

Also, since most objects are extended over time, you only access slices of
them ("representations" if you will :) ) - whatever these objects are, not
just the so-called "information objects". Hence, the issue raised by the
Web is a very generic one, albeit tied to a very specific architecture.
That is where the (main) difference lies in my opinion.

I might go on and on but I'll leave it here. :)

>> That would be my answer but Harry has another one for instance, more
>> related to the extended-mind hypothesis.
>
> I also could not see a fundamental change in Harrys example. We've had
> maps
> for some time and those maps were updated. That more people can do this
> now
> in a shorter timeframe does not strike me as qualitative change.

>
>> It seemed to me that chapter 8 made a nice link between the Web and the
>> Semantic Web thanks to a renewed notion of content negotiation - an
>> idea I
>> am in deep agreement with.
>
> I really liked that essay - it resonated much with my mind. I just
> wondered
> at the implicitness the Semantic Web was presented as next step in mind
> extension. Maybe we will one day learn important Web ontologies in
> school and
> use compact URIs like words :-) Or maybe the Semantic Web is simply not
> well
> suited or flexible enough for the human mind and other technologies will
> be
> used to "extend" it. The Semantic Web has its use cases anyway.

Yes, and they're not necessarily those found in academic textbooks. I guess
acknowledging this would prove helpful for the entire semweb community!

Maybe we won't live see the advent of "The Semantic Web" in the future and
it'll remain behind the scene but extant, just as it somehow remains
implicit in the essay? :)


>> That's why we might want to specify next what we talk about we we say
>> "the
>> Web" (not unlike what happens when we say "society"). I'm more
>> interested
>> in the architecture of the Web and its potentialities for instance but
>> others might want to put forward other aspects.
>
> True :-)

:)

> Regards,

Best!
A.

   - Membre du collège d'experts Open Data de la mission Etalab du Premier
   Ministre
   - Chercheur associé chez Inria (EPI Wimmics, Sophia Antipolis)
   - Co-initiateur du projet DBpedia Francophone et SemanticPedia
   - Docteur en philosophie à Paris 1 Panthéon -Sorbonne (PHICO, EXeCO) -
   Thèse sur la philosophie du Web : disponible et annotable sur
   http://philoweb.org
   - *Co-chair* du Community Group "Philosophy of the
Web<http://www.w3.org/community/philoweb/>"
   au W3C
   - Organisateur des "Rencontres du Web de
données<http://www.meetup.com/paris-web-of-data/>
   "


http://web-and-philosophy.org/,
Twitter : @aamonnz & @PhiloWeb,
PhiloWeb on Dailymotion <http://www.dailymotion.com/PhiloWeb>,
PhiloWeb discussion
list <https://lists-sop.inria.fr/sympa/info/philoweb> @INRIA