- From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 06:41:11 -0700
- To: "'PF'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <007e01d0f797$d7ad0ff0$87072fd0$@Gmail.com>
As discussed in the Sep 24 ARIA meeting, one of several aspects of issue 633 is clarifying the intent of aria-busy so its applicability to and use in design patterns for the articlefeed and itemfeed roles is clear. A new draft of aria-busy that incorporates feedback from yesterday's meeting is available at: http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/mck_issue633/aria/aria.html#aria-busy I have made the following changes from the current master branch, which is at: http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-busy 1. Change the definition to clearly state that aria-busy applies to all elements and is not limited to live regions and widgets. 2. Extended the definition to state that it applies only to modification that occurs after page load is complete. 3. Replaced the example with one that directly corresponds to the normative author MUST statement. 4. Added 2 normative MAY statements for assistive technologies that support both the general use case as well as use in articlefeed and itemfeed. 5. Removed the statement, "If there is an error updating the element, authors MAY set the aria-invalid attribute to true." Removed because:it does not match the definition of aria-invalid, which applies to user-enetered values, not script errors. Matt King
Received on Friday, 25 September 2015 13:41:43 UTC