- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:12:48 +0100
- To: "'James Craig'" <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: "'PF'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
> From: James Craig [mailto:jcraig@apple.com] > Sent: 11 September 2015 10:55 > > On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: > > > > It might be worth associating the two attribute names though? This for > > author usability as much as anything. Perhaps -current and -currenttype? > > I'll answer with few more questions: > > 1. Would the type might be useful outside the context of @aria-current? Probably, although I can't immediately think of a good example. > 2. Would the double "tt" make it easy for authors to misspell the attribute? Possibly, although in a trade-off against more meaningful attribute names, I'd say it's an acceptable risk. I rarely come across -labelledby spelt incorrectly, even amongst US English speaking developers, and think that's a far more likely candidate for mis-spelling. > 3. Has the working group considering making this attribute freeform text > instead of a token value? Consider it similar to @aria-roledescription. We did. That was the way the definition was originally written, but the TF decided against it for easier localisation, and to encourage more consistency in the way ATs indicated different types of current thing. Léonie. -- Senior accessibility engineer @PacielloGroup @LeonieWatson
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 16:13:11 UTC