- From: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:51:17 +0200
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: lwatson@paciellogroup.com, PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <911B5BDB-A8F9-47FF-9CD7-BFB268EAF71C@agosto.nl>
A downside to this implementation is that you need to have ID’s on everything. This is not a practice most developers use. Any thoughts on that? —Michiel > On 11 Sep 2015, at 11:54, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: >> >>> From: James Craig >>>> We have a concern with the aria-current proposal in its current form. >>>> >>>> From an implementation perspective, the specification makes it difficult >>>> to do things like announcing the current element in a list when you >>>> first navigate to the beginning of that list. >> >> How do you see this working from an AT user's perspective? Using your >> example, would a screen reader announce something like "List of N items, X >> is current TokenType"? For example, "List of 5 items, Home is current page". > > Yes, but probably with slightly less verbosity. As intended, the current > element would also be spoken as "current" when you navigate directly to it. > >> It might be worth associating the two attribute names though? This for >> author usability as much as anything. Perhaps -current and -currenttype? > > I'll answer with few more questions: > > 1. Would the type might be useful outside the context of @aria-current? > 2. Would the double "tt" make it easy for authors to misspell the attribute? > 3. Has the working group considering making this attribute freeform text > instead of a token value? Consider it similar to @aria-roledescription. > > James > >
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 15:52:11 UTC