Re: ACTION 1361 Updates to application and document roles ready for final review

wasn't the main role application?


Rich Schwerdtfeger



From:	Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>, "'PF'" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date:	11/12/2015 10:49 AM
Subject:	Re: ACTION 1361 Updates to application and document roles ready
            for  final review



On 2015-11-12 11:25 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> this is an interoperability problem. the subrole should be <nil>

Yuck!   The subrole should be AXApplication, although that likely
requires minting a new subrole.

--
;;;;joseph.

'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"'
            - G. Bernhardt -

Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 16:56:34 UTC