Re: [css-content] Request for note regarding selection, search, and accessibility of generated content from Dave Cramer on 2015-11-11 (public-pfwg@w3.org from November 2015)

From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:26:48 -0500
To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Cc: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADxXqOw0dR50vW0so52b=GYq2Ng91-irQBGeYyEK88qv+oro9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <
tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:

>
>
> It is a worth reviewing the specifics of the current draft of  Generated
> Content and Paged Media spec [1] to see that this has very little to do
> with decorative elements.
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-gcpm/
>
>
>

Note that the "generated content" part of the  "Generated Content for Paged
Media"  spec has been moved to the old "Generated Content" spec [2].

This spec has only recently been revived after twelve years of neglect.
We're in the process of cleaning it up now.

Thanks,

Dave

[2] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-content/

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:27:18 UTC