RE: HTML5 default implicit semantics

+1 to both Jason and Leonie

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Jason J [mailto:jjwhite@ets.org] 
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 1:23 PM
To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Cc: lwatson@paciellogroup.com; Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: HTML5 default implicit semantics


> On Nov 6, 2015, at 13:31, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote:
>
> Léonie Watson [mailto:lwatson@paciellogroup.com] wrote:
>>
>> When ARIA first came into existence we thought it was temporary. 
>> We've come a long way since then and ARIA is clearly here to stay. 
>> Perhaps this means we're at a good point to reevaluate the overall strategy and roadmap for ARIA?
>
> +1 to that.

I think the point was well made at the plenary session at TPAC that there are two aspects of Web technology: (1) tools such as APIs, Web Components, etc., that allow application authors to create their own customized features, e.g., new widgets; and (2) pre-built features for authors to use in their applications and documents, for example HTML elements.

The Web needs both, and we need to be able to make both accessible.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 21:55:08 UTC