- From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:40:47 +0200
- To: "public-pfwg" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <150c8d9c166.1238651cc849678.5710567554943048489@zoho.com>
Hi FolksI am thinking that we do not want to repeat the discussions in the issue papers or in the techniques again in the gap analysis It would be better to do it as a table with links and references to the main discussion - such as an issue paper or WCAG or ARIA proposal Such as User Needs Content and HTML WCAG New Semantics Personalization Operating System/Other Discussions Simpler content New SC required to require making content adaptable https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG#Enable_adaptability https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html Familiar UI Json easy personalization proposal https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG#Enable_adaptability https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html Familiar language Usable security All the best Lisa Seeman Athena ICT Accessibility Projects LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Monday, 2 November 2015 15:41:16 UTC