Re: Question about "Implicit value for Role"

Actually, no.  I don't even know what "Implicit value for Role" means
really.  I can guess, but I would have assumed it was only relevant in a
host language context.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Can you provide an example?
>
> Matt King
> IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
> I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist
> IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement
> Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398
> mattking@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> From:        Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
> To:        "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>,
> Date:        03/22/2015 05:24 PM
> Subject:        Question about "Implicit value for Role"
> Sent by:        ahby@aptest.com
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> If there is data in the value for this field for a given role (e.g.,
> "select") and another role references that role as a superclass, should the
> new "child" role inherit those implicit values automatically?
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.