Re: [REVIEW REQUESTED] Action-1548: Updating the note text for aria-current

I opened in the past an action for similar issue [1], about ARIA switch
role. There's bunch of roles through the spec that conflicts with error
handling section. Is it ok to include that action into your next meeting as
a starter for this large issue?

[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1592

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:

> Aha. Yeah, conflicts are bad. If you've not already done so, could you
> please open a new issue against the UAIG so we can discuss it at our
> meeting on Tuesday?
>
> Thanks!
> --joanie
>
> On 03/12/2015 05:07 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> > My point was that UAIG has error handling section which conflicts with
> > ARIA spec aria-current definition. I'm not sure which spec should define
> > error handling but it'd be great if it was defined in one place.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com
> > <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     If you're suggesting that text be removed from the spec and placed in
> >     the mapping document, I don't think so. I think the ARIA spec
> explains
> >     what should be exposed (or not); the mapping document explains how
> >     things which should be exposed are to be exposed on each platform.
> >     Right?
> >
> >     --joanie
> >
> >     On 03/12/2015 04:35 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> >     > Thank you, Joanie. It's much better. Nevertheless wouldn't it be
> >     > reasonable to let UAIG to handle that instead? In that case, the
> browser
> >     > would expose the value the author provided.
> >     >
> >     > Thanks again.
> >     > Alex.
> >     >
> >     > [1]
> >     >
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#document-handling_author-errors
> >     >
> >     > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <
> jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>
> >     > <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Hey Alex.
> >     >
> >     >     I myself don't see your proposal as particularly unreasonable,
> and
> >     >     unstable branch is unstable. So....
> >     >     https://github.com/w3c/aria/commit/1d0bb68c. :) Let's see
> what others
> >     >     think. In the meantime, does that address your concerns?
> >     >
> >     >     --joanie
> >     >
> >     >     On 03/12/2015 03:50 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> >     >     > Hi, Joanie. It seems that my concern I raised last time [1]
> is not yet
> >     >     > addressed.
> >     >     > Thanks.
> >     >     > Alex.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Jan/0148.html
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <
> jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>
> >     <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>>
> >     >     > <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>
> >     <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>>>> wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Hey all.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     As per today's ARIA meeting, I updated aria-current in
> >     the spec to
> >     >     >     reflect the text proposed by Matt and discussed on the
> >     19 February
> >     >     >     meeting. We stated today that the first note is not a
> note,
> >     >     but the
> >     >     >     second and third notes are. I wasn't looking at the text
> >     >     closely when
> >     >     >     this was agreed. Having looked at it closely, the second
> >     note
> >     >     strikes me
> >     >     >     as something that really belongs as a normative
> statement:
> >     >     It's not
> >     >     >     merely suggested that authors not substitute
> >     aria-current when
> >     >     >     aria-selected is called for; authors SHOULD NOT make that
> >     >     substitution
> >     >     >     (right?). So the commit I just made does that. As a
> >     result of
> >     >     not doing
> >     >     >     what we discussed today, I'm flagging this for review.
> >     Let me
> >     >     know if
> >     >     >     you want me to make it a true note.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >      http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-current
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Thanks!
> >     >     >     --joanie
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> >
>
>