Re: [REVIEW REQUESTED] Action-1548: Updating the note text for aria-current

Hi, Joanie. It seems that my concern I raised last time [1] is not yet
addressed.
Thanks.
Alex.

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Jan/0148.html

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:

> Hey all.
>
> As per today's ARIA meeting, I updated aria-current in the spec to
> reflect the text proposed by Matt and discussed on the 19 February
> meeting. We stated today that the first note is not a note, but the
> second and third notes are. I wasn't looking at the text closely when
> this was agreed. Having looked at it closely, the second note strikes me
> as something that really belongs as a normative statement: It's not
> merely suggested that authors not substitute aria-current when
> aria-selected is called for; authors SHOULD NOT make that substitution
> (right?). So the commit I just made does that. As a result of not doing
> what we discussed today, I'm flagging this for review. Let me know if
> you want me to make it a true note.
>
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-current
>
> Thanks!
> --joanie
>
>