+1
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
To: "Gunderson, Jon R" <jongund@illinois.edu>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, WAI Protocols & Formats
<public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 06/18/2015 02:54 PM
Subject: Re: aria-level a required property for role="heading" or a
supported property with an RFC SHOULD for authors
+1
Sent from my iPad
On 18.06.2015, at 21:46, Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu> wrote:
+1 from me for requiring aria-level
One possible solution for widget libraries is auto detect what
heading level they should be based on other headings in the web page
or it can be a configuration option that authors can define based on
their usage.
Jon
From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:26 PM
To: WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: aria-level a required property for role="heading" or a
supported property with an RFC SHOULD for authors
The ARIA task force had issue that pertained to making aria-level a
required property vs. a supported property for role="heading".
We would like list feedback as to whether this should required or
rather have an RFC 2119 SHOULD for its use as a supported property in
role "heading".
Please see the minutes of the discussion:
http://www.w3.org/2015/06/18-aria-minutes.html
Rich Schwerdtfeger
