- From: Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:40:46 -0700
- To: "jason@accessibleculture.org" <jason@accessibleculture.org>
- Cc: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <201506160041.t5G0fhND005733@d01av05.pok.ibm.com>
Hmm... I think those are ambiguous and potentially misleading words. Matt King IBM Senior Technical Staff Member I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398 mattking@us.ibm.com From: "jason@accessibleculture.org" <jason@accessibleculture.org> To: Matthew King/Fishkill/IBM@IBMUS, Cc: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 06/15/2015 03:05 PM Subject: Re: [ARIA] Table and cell roles have been added to the spec. Thanks. Okay, so not invalid to keep as table. But the spec does suggest such a sortable table *should* be a grid, doesn’t it? At least that’s how I read it where it states that in the case where a table "allows the user to rearrange or otherwise manipulate its contents or the display thereof, authors SHOULD use grid or treegrid instead.” Is it just me? Jason Kiss jason@accessibleculture.org http://www.accessibleculture.org On 16/06/2015, at 9:39 am, Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com> wrote: It is not necessary to make a sortable table into an interactive read-only grid where the entire grid is navigable with arrow keys. It is just as valid to leave it as a static table where each header is a tab stop. Matt King IBM Senior Technical Staff Member I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398 mattking@us.ibm.com From: Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org> To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, Cc: "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 06/14/2015 07:48 PM Subject: Re: [ARIA] Table and cell roles have been added to the spec. Based on the definition of the table role, I'd just like to confirm that a simple, otherwise static table that can be reordered by column (e.g. via links in or on the column headers) effectively becomes an interactive grid, and so should rightly use role="grid", if that role is not already exposed somehow by the browser? Does that sound right? Thanks, Jason On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > As per yesterday's meeting [1], I have merged the table and cell roles > into the spec. I will propose clarifying text to address the readonly > and required properties being inherited by columnheader and rowheader as > per action-1646 [2]. Lastly, I'll create a branch with some > mostly-editorial changes for the grid-related content in the spec, > probably some time next week. > > The new roles can be found here: > https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#cell > https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#table > > --joanie > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/06/04-aria-minutes.html#item01 > [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1646 >
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 00:42:19 UTC