- From: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:31:25 -0500
- To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF1975CF5C.3E62CF83-ON85257DCF.00551C9C-85257DCF.00554804@us.ibm.com>
Sorry about the wrong date for the minutes in the last email subject. It
is the minutes for Friday January 16 not March ...
Regards, Fred
Fred Esch
Accessibility, Watson Innovations
AARB Complex Visualization Working Group
Chair
W3C SVG A11y Task Force
IBM Watson Group
----- Forwarded by Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM on 01/16/2015 10:29 AM -----
From: Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM
To: public-svg-a11y@w3.org
Date: 01/16/2015 10:27 AM
Subject: minutes for Friday March 13, 2015
http://www.w3.org/2015/01/16-svg-a11y-minutes.html
W3C
- DRAFT -
SVG Accessibility task Force
16 Jan 2015
Agenda
See also: IRC log
Attendees
Present
Regrets
Chair
Fred
Scribe
fesch
Contents
Topics
1. Chart type Taxonomy
Summary of Action Items
1. Reminder on SVG2 Accessibility API Mappings (Rich) 2 minutes
2. Action 1 update - where are we on definitions for staw man taxonomy
(Fred) 2 minutes
<richardschwerdtfeger> this #svg-a11y is 2742
3. Joint meeting with SVG WG (Doug) 5 minutes
3. Review of chart type taxonomy (Doug)
<richardschwerdtfeger>
http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html
<scribe> scribe: fesch
rs: discussion on SVG2 Accessibility API Mappings
fesch: can start email threads on taxonomy definitions
<richardschwerdtfeger> fred: posted a .doc file of the taxonomy
<richardschwerdtfeger> fred: will post an HMTL version
doug: please use HTML format instead of docs
Chart type Taxonomy
<shepazu>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0006.html
<AmeliaBR> Doug's email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0006.html
doug: I think it is good to come from both angles - doesn't see a big
difference between the staw man taxonomy
... chart type taxonomy has more properties - roles, category, values,
parent applies to...
... describing axis
fesch: issues on "aria-axisdimension"
doug: may have different level of abstractions - depending on whether we
have well known charts or not
jw: aria defines a ontology which is a conceptional hierarchy, and we may
have very specific kind some may instantiate and some more abstract
... lets think of this a hierarchy
doug: in aria 1 you can't instantiate an higher level abstract role, we
will allow instantiating higher level roles
rich: discussion on aria-axisdimension can be a attribute...
... don't need to include role in the attribute name -ie aria-axisdimension
could be dimension
doug: thinks the long name aria-axisdimension makes it easier for software
to read it
fesch: discussion on axis vs dimensions
doug: lets delay detailed discussion on axis vs dimension
... described legends
... described dataset
... might have multiple datasets in a chart
fred: does a dataset = a table?
amelia: a dataset could be a table and rows are a data point
doug: data set may not = a table
amelia: likes term facet
doug: tried to limit aria roles and attributes to make it easy to put in
the SVG
... tried to map to objects in the SVG
rs: doug is saying axis is an important container... affects the mapping
specification which we need to consider
doug: advantage is you must be explicit so the screen reader can extract
the information
rs: each role has a defined name computation strategy - two ways to
approach it, name from content... we don't want name from context
doug: mentions different facets, x, y, legend, size.... might have
invisible facet in there
rs: what is strategy on axis labels?
doug: strategy varies
... for value min and value max might be better strategy than worrying
about axis ticks
... should have document on interaction modes
rs: graphs may be scrollable....
... do you think scrollable interaction is valuable or not?
doug: yes
fesch: defender view vs scrollable, zoomable - scrollable, zoomable get
whole chart, defender view - get a window - as a entire chart
amelia: likes strategy of focusing on mappings... will work on strawmen and
keeping stuff general
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015-01-16 15:25:30 $
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Found Scribe: fesch
Inferring ScribeNick: fesch
WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: AmeliaBR amelia doug fesch fred jw rich
richardschwerdtfeger rs shepazu
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
<dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
<dbooth> Present+ amy
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0005.html
Got date from IRC log name: 16 Jan 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/01/16-svg-a11y-minutes.html
People with action items:
WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]
Regards, Fred
Fred Esch
Accessibility, Watson Innovations
AARB Complex Visualization Working Group
Chair
W3C SVG A11y Task Force
IBM Watson Group
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: C4921880.gif
- image/jpeg attachment: C4160917.jpg
- image/gif attachment: C4652587.gif
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 15:31:55 UTC