- From: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:31:25 -0500
- To: PF <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF1975CF5C.3E62CF83-ON85257DCF.00551C9C-85257DCF.00554804@us.ibm.com>
Sorry about the wrong date for the minutes in the last email subject. It is the minutes for Friday January 16 not March ... Regards, Fred Fred Esch Accessibility, Watson Innovations AARB Complex Visualization Working Group Chair W3C SVG A11y Task Force IBM Watson Group ----- Forwarded by Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM on 01/16/2015 10:29 AM ----- From: Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM To: public-svg-a11y@w3.org Date: 01/16/2015 10:27 AM Subject: minutes for Friday March 13, 2015 http://www.w3.org/2015/01/16-svg-a11y-minutes.html W3C - DRAFT - SVG Accessibility task Force 16 Jan 2015 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present Regrets Chair Fred Scribe fesch Contents Topics 1. Chart type Taxonomy Summary of Action Items 1. Reminder on SVG2 Accessibility API Mappings (Rich) 2 minutes 2. Action 1 update - where are we on definitions for staw man taxonomy (Fred) 2 minutes <richardschwerdtfeger> this #svg-a11y is 2742 3. Joint meeting with SVG WG (Doug) 5 minutes 3. Review of chart type taxonomy (Doug) <richardschwerdtfeger> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html <scribe> scribe: fesch rs: discussion on SVG2 Accessibility API Mappings fesch: can start email threads on taxonomy definitions <richardschwerdtfeger> fred: posted a .doc file of the taxonomy <richardschwerdtfeger> fred: will post an HMTL version doug: please use HTML format instead of docs Chart type Taxonomy <shepazu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0006.html <AmeliaBR> Doug's email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0006.html doug: I think it is good to come from both angles - doesn't see a big difference between the staw man taxonomy ... chart type taxonomy has more properties - roles, category, values, parent applies to... ... describing axis fesch: issues on "aria-axisdimension" doug: may have different level of abstractions - depending on whether we have well known charts or not jw: aria defines a ontology which is a conceptional hierarchy, and we may have very specific kind some may instantiate and some more abstract ... lets think of this a hierarchy doug: in aria 1 you can't instantiate an higher level abstract role, we will allow instantiating higher level roles rich: discussion on aria-axisdimension can be a attribute... ... don't need to include role in the attribute name -ie aria-axisdimension could be dimension doug: thinks the long name aria-axisdimension makes it easier for software to read it fesch: discussion on axis vs dimensions doug: lets delay detailed discussion on axis vs dimension ... described legends ... described dataset ... might have multiple datasets in a chart fred: does a dataset = a table? amelia: a dataset could be a table and rows are a data point doug: data set may not = a table amelia: likes term facet doug: tried to limit aria roles and attributes to make it easy to put in the SVG ... tried to map to objects in the SVG rs: doug is saying axis is an important container... affects the mapping specification which we need to consider doug: advantage is you must be explicit so the screen reader can extract the information rs: each role has a defined name computation strategy - two ways to approach it, name from content... we don't want name from context doug: mentions different facets, x, y, legend, size.... might have invisible facet in there rs: what is strategy on axis labels? doug: strategy varies ... for value min and value max might be better strategy than worrying about axis ticks ... should have document on interaction modes rs: graphs may be scrollable.... ... do you think scrollable interaction is valuable or not? doug: yes fesch: defender view vs scrollable, zoomable - scrollable, zoomable get whole chart, defender view - get a window - as a entire chart amelia: likes strategy of focusing on mappings... will work on strawmen and keeping stuff general Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log) $Date: 2015-01-16 15:25:30 $ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: fesch Inferring ScribeNick: fesch WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AmeliaBR amelia doug fesch fred jw rich richardschwerdtfeger rs shepazu You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-a11y/2015Jan/0005.html Got date from IRC log name: 16 Jan 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/01/16-svg-a11y-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. [End of scribe.perl diagnostic output] Regards, Fred Fred Esch Accessibility, Watson Innovations AARB Complex Visualization Working Group Chair W3C SVG A11y Task Force IBM Watson Group
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: C4921880.gif
- image/jpeg attachment: C4160917.jpg
- image/gif attachment: C4652587.gif
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 15:31:55 UTC