RE: ARIA Meeting move time

+0 .. either arrangement works equally well. *grin*

The important thing is that there is no -1.

 

 

From: Cynthia Shelly [mailto:cyns@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 6:23 PM
To: Matthew King; Richard Schwerdtfeger
Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: RE: ARIA Meeting move time

 

+1

 

From: Matthew King [mailto:mattking@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 3:21 PM
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger
Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: Re: ARIA Meeting move time

 

+1 

Matt King
IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist
IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement 
Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398
mattking@us.ibm.com 



From:        Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS 
To:        "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, 
Date:        01/05/2015 03:04 PM 
Subject:        ARIA Meeting move time 

  _____  




I am looking at the survey results and it would appear that the best thing
to do would be to split the difference and have the call start at 12:30
Boston time. 

This would alot some time for Cynthia, James Craig, and Bryan to get into
work and it would allow James Nurthen to catch part of the call every 2
months.  It will also people to attend the HTML5 working group call as it
usually only lasts a half hour. 

Here are the survey results:

 <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/32212/201501_aria-time/results>
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/32212/201501_aria-time/results

Will that work? 

Best, 
Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger