This is beginning to sound like an attempt to define an “interaction context”! In the WCAG2ICT Task Force we spent many days arguing about whether it was possible to clearly define an interaction context – and in the end we could not do so.
Best regards
Mike
From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 April 2015 15:54
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: Matthew King; Birkir Gunnarsson; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats; Weditors WCAG2ICT
Subject: Re: Is there an html or WCAG definition of "modality" as it relates to keyboard behavior in a modeal dialog?
On 20 April 2015 at 08:33, Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org<mailto:gregg@raisingthefloor.org>> wrote:
GV: Hmmm. the dialog box sounds like a context to me. and moving out of the dialog box using standard navigation commands (arrows or tab-key) would seem to be a ‘change of context due to change of focus” which would be a WCAG SC failure. explicit commands (like hot keys or command key combinations ) would not violate it - but moving focus around in a context should not jump them out of that context. At least that is my take. If you want a ruling you might run this past the committee as a whole. I added the chairs to this email for their information.
Hi Gregg,
If a web page is a context, and moving outside of a web page via the tab key is a change of context, then every web page would fail the WCAG 2.0 criteria as the address bar of browsers (if present) recieves focus after the last focusable element in the page.
--
Regards
SteveF
HTML 5.1<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>