- From: Marco Zehe <mzehe@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:42:14 +0200
- To: LWatson@PacielloGroup.com, 'W3C WAI Protocols & Formats' <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <540F1FD6.6040101@mozilla.com>
Hi Léonie, well, it can be expanded itself, too, for exxample an item in a tree view that has child nodes. In any case, it controls whether some other parts are showing (expanded) or hidden (collapsed). Marco On 09.09.2014 17:37, Léonie Watson wrote: > > Marco Zehe wrote: > > "I believe so, and I am recommending it be used that way. I even wrote > an ARIA tip about it: > http://www.marcozehe.de/2010/02/10/easy-aria-tip-5-aria-expanded-and-aria-controls/" > > > > Thanks Marco. > > > > Your article recommends putting aria-expanded "on the element that > actually does the magic (the same element that has the onclick handler > or click/keyboard event listener)". This makes complete sense. > > > > The spec says something slightly different though. > > > > "Indicates whether the element, or another grouping element it > controls, is currently expanded or collapsed." > > > > It may just be mis-placed commas making the language ambiguous, but if > you take out the middle clause of that sentence, it reads like this: > > > > "Indicates whether the element is currently expanded or collapsed." > > > > Which implies something very different, that aria-expanded can be > applied to an element that can itself be expanded or collapsed. > > > > I think it is just ambiguous spec text, but wanted to sanity check my > thinking before filing a bug. > > > > Léonie. > > > > > > -- > > Léonie Watson -- Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG > > @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 15:42:44 UTC