- From: Léonie Watson <LWatson@PacielloGroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:34:52 -0000
- To: "'Matthew King'" <mattking@us.ibm.com>, <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 17:35:16 UTC
Matt King wrote: “Note: When applied to an element contained in a widget that supports selection, the meaning of aria-current is different from the meaning of [aria-selected]. Authors should not use aria-current in lieu of aria-selected and should avoid using aria-current in circumstances where the meaning of aria-current would be the same as aria-selected. For example, in a single-select [tablist] where the selected [tab] element corresponds to the displayed tabpanel, aria-current is unnecessary. However, if the selected state of a tab is used to indicate which tab is selected for an action, such as move, delete, or make current, then aria-current should be used to indicate which tab represents the currently displayed tabpanel.” This still feels a bit confusing. I’m tempted to suggest that aria-current and aria-selected should never be used simultaneously on the same element. The UX for someone hearing that an element was both selected and current would be very confusing. Léonie. -- Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 17:35:16 UTC