- From: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 01:21:36 +0000
- To: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Just passing this to the public list in case it gets caught on the non-public one. -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 5:06 PM To: Bryan Garaventa; public-touchevents@w3.org; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats; Steve Faulkner Subject: Re: Errata for Touch Events: Introduction note on Touch Events Accessibility Mapping On 15/11/2014 00:59, Bryan Garaventa wrote: > Why not add the data already compiled at > http://patrickhlauke.github.io/touch/tests/results/ I guess that's a question for the WAI PF WG (who won't see this reply, I assume? If this could be forwarded by somebody who is allowed...). Just strikes me that the WG must have promised that the non-normative document referred to in the TE spec would be created, but never got around to it... Don't mind my results being used (though a small hat-tip would be appreciated). Or, the note could be amended and pointed to the Touch and Pointer Events CG (unless that breaks some W3C policy about linking to CGs rather than WG wikis?) P > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:37 AM > To: public-touchevents@w3.org; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats > Subject: Errata for Touch Events: Introduction note on Touch Events > Accessibility Mapping > > In the introduction http://www.w3.org/TR/touch-events/#introduction > there is currently a note: > > "The W3C's Protocols and Formats Working Group created a non-normative > document that includes a mapping of hardware events (e.g. keyboard > events) to touch events. For more information see Touch Events Accessibility Mapping." > > However, following the link only takes you to a placeholder page. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/wiki/Touch_Events_Accessibility_Mapping > > Are there any plans to flesh this placeholder out? Or should the note be amended/removed? > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 01:22:07 UTC