On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:55 AM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Or you could move the document to the new process. Which means you can
> stay in CR. Although you still need to get approval for the new version,
> just as if you were going from LC to CR, given there are limited changes it
> should be pretty straightforward.
>
I believe we discussed this option at TPAC:
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html#item13 (very end of this
topic) Paul proposed running a CfC to switch Canvas to new process.
mark
>
> cheers
>
> 22.10.2014, 04:07, "Rik Cabanier" <cabanier@gmail.com>:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <
> schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> Sam,
> >>
> >> At the last meeting we dicussed meeting times on Canvas at the face to
> face. This is proving to be problematic:
> >>
> >> 1. SVG, HTML, and PF all meet on the same 2 days at the face to face
> meeting
> >> 2. I am a member of all 3 working groups
> >> 3. PF has scheduled my time in group sessions with HTML, SVG, Digital
> Publishing, and CSS as well as ARIA.next the last day.
> >>
> >> I don't have any control over the scheduling of TPAC but since we never
> got around to scheduling exact times for things like Canvas until now I
> don't see any bandwidth for participating in an canvas discussion now. Mark
> will have time and will have changes to the canvas spec. based on
> implementations and will be able to bring those changes to the working
> group for Canvas 1.
> >>
> >> Mark has completed many of the test cases and testing on the test cases
> I specified. I am working with him on areas where there is confusion. Mark
> is now into the hit region testing and he is working on the scroll testing.
> He has been filing bugs on the browser manufacturers. So, a lot of progress
> has been made. I envision a quick jump back to last call and then a rapid
> pass through CR assuming implementation testing continues to go the way it
> has - very well.
> >>
> >> It would be nice if there was a way to expedite this round trip like
> HTML has done. Is that possible?
> > Hi Rich,
> > are you envisioning substantive changes to the spec or is this just
> about clarifying existing features? If it is the latter, we can stay in CR.
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>