Re: ACTION-1442: Draft spec text for aria-current and aria-currentfor

I'm good with it. If it will be extended to allow custom values then it's
still fine with me.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Léonie Watson <LWatson@paciellogroup.com>
wrote:

> My sense from the discussion is that aria-currentfor is not worth
> pursuing, so I’ll park it for now. If anyone has good reasons for us to
> pick it up again, let me know.
>
>
>
> I’ve updated the aria-current definition based on suggestions from this
> discussion. It no longer requires a navigation container in its ancestry,
> and can now be applied to all elements in the base markup. I’ve also
> amended the wording of the recommended UA behaviour for false/undefined,
> and referenced its relationship to visual styling.
>
>
>
> As always, comments welcome…
>
>
>
> 1.       Aria-current attribute.
>
>
>
> Indicates the element that represents the current item within a container.
>
>
>
> The aria-current attribute indicates whether the element is current
> (true), or not current (false). If the aria-current attribute is false or
> undefined, the current state of the element should not be conveyed by User
> Agents.
>
>
>
> For example the aria-current attribute may be used to indicate the current
> document in a collection or the current step in a process, where the
> current item is otherwise highlighted visually.
>
>
>
> Note
>
> The aria-current attribute is similar to the aria-selected attribute, but
> there are important differences. the aria-selected attribute indicates the
> selected state of children within certain widgets, whilst the aria-current
> attribute indicates the current element within the scope of a container.
>
>
>
> Characteristics of aria-current
>
> Used in roles: All elements of the base markup.
>
> Value: true/false/undefined
>
>
>
> Values of aria-current
>
> true: The element is current
>
> false: The element is not current
>
> undefined: The element cannot be current
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Léonie.
>
> --
>
> Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG
>
> @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 19:16:25 UTC