- From: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:39:53 -0500
- To: Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Léonie Watson <LWatson@paciellogroup.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+epNsfay-yuVDEZ4jgExJwkrW4bqCFUHC6Yz_9eqGxNjJ0k9A@mail.gmail.com>
I guess it's helpful for navigation, if AT wants to move by currentable elements. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Matthew King <mattking@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > If I understand the use cases… > > aria-current is used when the scoping container is known, and > aria-currentfor for when it must be manually determined. > > Why do we need to specify a scoping container? What would AT do with that > information? > > Matt King > IBM Senior Technical Staff Member > I/T Chief Accessibility Strategist > IBM BT/CIO - Global Workforce and Web Process Enablement > Phone: (503) 578-2329, Tie line: 731-7398 > mattking@us.ibm.com > > > > From: Léonie Watson <LWatson@PacielloGroup.com> > To: Matthew King/Fishkill/IBM@IBMUS, > Cc: <public-pfwg@w3.org> > Date: 11/06/2014 01:18 PM > Subject: RE: ACTION-1442: Draft spec text for aria-current and > aria-currentfor > ------------------------------ > > > > Matthew King wrote: > “I am still not clear on the need for aria-currentfor.” > > If I understand the use cases… aria-current is used when the scoping > container is known, and aria-currentfor for when it must be manually > determined. > > “Is it necessary for there to be a navigation container in the ancestry? > I have encountered use cases that would not necessarily have that. For > instance, if the author is indicating current step in a list of steps, > there might not be a nav element or navigation region in the ancestry. In > this use case, the list of steps may be static, or they may be links or > buttons that navigate to other steps. If they are static, they might not > have a navigation container in their ancestry.” > > Yes, but we need a way to define the scope for those elements. This is the > use case for aria-currentfor as I understand it. > > “Also, do you think it is necessary to so tightly constrain the elements > to which it can be applied? We may want to consider making it global.” > > I think this will depend on how we scope the respective attributes. I > think that allowing aria-current on all elements in the base markup would > be problematic, especially if we decide not to constrain its scope. > > > Léonie. > > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG > @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 21:40:24 UTC