- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:28:59 -0400
- To: WAI CG <w3c-wai-cg@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Colleagues: During our last CG telecon I was asked to summarize PF's new proposed convention on document naming for a complex of documents which we expect to publish in the coming years growing out of our ARIA.Next activities. The proposed naming scheme is as follows, where X stands for a particular markup technology: "The X Accessibility APIs Mapping Guide" As of this writing we expect a minimum of 3 documents will bear this title in the next two years: The Core ARIA Accessibility APIs Mapping Guide, will be the partial successor to the recently published ARIA 1.0 User Agent Guide. This "core" guide will specify normative requirements on any user agent implementing ARIA 1.1 (and above). The above normative requirements are seen as pertaining to any user agent implementing ARIA. Added to that will be a series of optional markup technology specific normative requirements on user agents implementing particular markup technologyes. Two such are expected in the next 2 years. The HTML5 Accessibility APIs Mapping Guide, also a partial successor to the ARIA 1.0 User Agent Guide, will map additional ARIA markup as well as all HTML elements to the various accessibility APIs. The SVG2 Accessibility APIs Mapping Guide will map additional ARIA markup particular to SVG as well as all SVG elements to the various accessibility APIs. There may be additional guides, e.g. for Epub. These additional guides are "optional" only in the sense that only user agents implementing the particular markup technology need implement the normative requirements specified in these guides. It is our desire that our document naming convention help indicate these documents are related one to another. Is this scheme sufficient? Or should we also seek to indicate the parent/child relationship by perhaps using an additional term in the title, i.e. The Supplamentary X Accessibility APIs Mapping Guide ... so that it's clear there's a "Core" guide, as well as "Supplamentary" guides? This last notion is new in this email, not previously discussed. Please give us your thoughts. We want to get this naming scheme right, as we will likely live with our decision for many years to come. Janina -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 12:29:36 UTC