W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Is there an official place to document current role compatibility differences?

From: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:35:39 -0700
Message-ID: <6240AA9B9D3F4B2BBB8D53D2E9C8155A@WAMPAS>
To: "Birkir Gunnarsson" <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>, <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Personally I'd like it if there were cells for all mainstream browsers.

E.G
http://quirksmode.org/dom/core/

This would make it easy to determine which roles were supported within the various browsers, and if supported in a particular browser, where the ATs still fall short in support, making it easy for browser and AT developers to see where the shortfalls are.

Much of this information lives in our heads, but it's not that helpful when we have to keep explaining this stuff from the start over and over again, and we all have unique information we could add to this I think.




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Birkir Gunnarsson 
  To: 'Bryan Garaventa' ; public-pfwg@w3.org 
  Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 8:55 AM
  Subject: RE: Is there an official place to document current role compatibility differences?


  Would such a table include both browsers as well as assistive technology applications?

   

  From: Bryan Garaventa [mailto:bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com] 
  Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:51 AM
  To: public-pfwg@w3.org
  Subject: Is there an official place to document current role compatibility differences?

   

  Is there an official place, site, wiki, or other where current role compatibility differences within AT/browser combinations can be documented?

   

  It would be useful if there were a matrix document where, when differences in support were discovered it could easily be noted within a table for this purpose, as a running support compatibility table.

   

  Does this already exist?
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 16:36:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC